Three custom gaming PC builds, each with a budget of $550, were compared for gaming performance and value. The builds were evaluated using 3DMark and several gaming titles, including DOOM Eternal, Helldivers 2, Red Dead Redemption 2, Tiny Tina's Wonderlands, and Total War: Warhammer 3. The testing focused on average frame rates and 0.1% low frame rates to determine the best gaming experience. While all builds were competitive, the results varied based on the specific game and API used. The participants, who each built their own machine, discussed the challenges of sourcing components within the strict budget, including the use of used parts and the limitations of proprietary hardware. The comparison highlights the trade-offs between cost, performance, and future upgradeability in budget gaming PC builds. The findings suggest that while all systems are capable of gaming, the choice of components significantly impacts the overall experience and potential for future upgrades.
Three custom gaming PCs were built with a strict $550 budget, including shipping costs. The builds were tested across five gaming titles and 3DMark to evaluate performance and frame rate stability.
The evaluation criteria prioritized gaming experience, specifically average frame rates and 0.1% low frame rates. The participants used a mix of new and used components, including proprietary parts, to stay within the budget.
The results showed that all three builds were competitive, with no single system failing to run the tested games. The participants discussed the trade-offs of their component choices, such as upgradeability and power efficiency.
Chapter guide
Worth noting
- The performance results are based on a limited set of games and benchmarks, which may not reflect real-world performance in all scenarios.
- The builds used a mix of new and used components, which may affect the reliability and longevity of the systems.
- The participants' subjective experiences and preferences may have influenced the evaluation of the builds.