Google Pixel 11 Pro XL leads in photography while iPhone 17 Pro Max remains superior for video

The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL outperforms the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra in still photography, offering more natural detail and superior color accuracy. While the Pixel's 5x periscope camera now features a larger 1/1.95-inch sensor, its primary strength lies in software processing that avoids the over-sharpening seen in Samsung's output. The Pixel also demonstrates improved skin tone reproduction, particularly for Indian skin tones, and leads in portrait mode edge detection at 5x zoom. However, the iPhone 17 Pro Max maintains its lead in video performance, supporting 4K at 120fps and ProRes recording, features still absent from the Pixel. Google's "Video Boost" and "Pro Stable Video" rely on cloud-based processing to enhance low-light footage and stabilization, providing a significant but non-local advantage. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra offers the most versatile hardware on paper but is hampered by inconsistent tuning and inaccurate skin tones. Notable concerns include the Pixel's AI-driven "ProRes Zoom," which has been observed to invent non-existent details in high-zoom shots. Additionally, the Pixel's "Instant Night Sight" prioritizes capture speed over detail retention, resulting in softer images compared to competitors in low-light environments.

The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL outperforms the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra in still photography, offering more natural detail and superior color accuracy. While the Pixel's 5x periscope camera now features a larger 1/1.95-inch sensor, its primary strength lies in software processing that avoids the over-sharpening seen in Samsung's output. The Pixel also demonstrates improved skin tone reproduction, particularly for Indian skin tones, and leads in portrait mode edge detection at 5x zoom. However, the iPhone 17 Pro Max maintains its lead in video performance, supporting 4K at 120fps and ProRes recording, features still absent from the Pixel. Google's "Video Boost" and "Pro Stable Video" rely on cloud-based processing to enhance low-light footage and stabilization, providing a significant but non-local advantage. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra offers the most versatile hardware on paper but is hampered by inconsistent tuning and inaccurate skin tones. Notable concerns include the Pixel's AI-driven "ProRes Zoom," which has been observed to invent non-existent details in high-zoom shots. Additionally, the Pixel's "Instant Night Sight" prioritizes capture speed over detail retention, resulting in softer images compared to competitors in low-light environments.

The Pixel 11 Pro XL provides the most natural image processing and accurate color reproduction among the three flagships. iPhone 17 Pro Max remains the industry leader for video, offering 4K 120fps and professional ProRes recording capabilities.

Samsung's Galaxy S26 Ultra suffers from over-sharpening and inaccurate skin tones despite having versatile camera hardware. Google's 5x periscope camera now utilizes a larger 1/1.95-inch sensor for improved detail and low-light performance.

The Pixel's AI-enhanced zoom has been shown to hallucinate details that do not exist in the physical scene. Cloud-based "Video Boost" significantly improves low-light video quality and stabilization on the Pixel 11 Pro XL.

Pixel's "Instant Night Sight" is 4.5 times faster than previous versions but results in softer low-light images.

Chapter guide

Worth noting

  • This comparison features the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, which are unreleased products.
  • Pixel's "Video Boost" and "Pro Stable Video" require off-device cloud processing.
  • AI-driven zoom on the Pixel has been demonstrated to invent details not present in the original subject.

Watch the original video ↗